Retired APSRTC driver sought a mandamus directing alternative employment under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities Act. The Court closed the writ petition, holding nothing survived for adjudication given the petitioner's age.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
133041
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PT{T{TfI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 11425 OF 2006
Vasant Rao, S/o.Late Ram Krishna Rao Retd. Driver E.No.2021055, of APSRTC Falaknuma Depot, R/o.H.No.18-86-16, Balajinagar Village, New Big Mosque, Shameerpet, Ranga Reddy District.
PETIT]ONER
D
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to provide any alternativejob considering the representation dated 31.3.2006 under the provision of Sec.47 of the persons with disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of rights and full participation) Act, 1995 or under any other law/agreement in force as this Honble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
l.A. NO: t OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 14192 OF 20OG)
. Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation dated 31.3.2006 Under Provisions of Sec.47 of the Person with disabilities (Equal Opportunity, protection
of rights and fullparticipation) Act 1955,pending disposalof main Writ Petition and to p?SS S;uch other order or orders as thisHon'bleCourt may deem fit and proper in the r:ircumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MOHD.GHOUSUDDIN
Gounsel for the Respondents: SRI THOOM SRINIVAS(SC FOR TSRTC)
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
\ \
\ \
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU
When the matter is taken up forhearingtoday,learned counsel for the respondents submittedthat the learned counselfor the petitioner has expired.
As a :sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this
Writ Petitiorr, shall stand closed.
*SD/.T. SRINIVASA REDDY REGISTRAR
/
To,
//TRUE COPYII
OFFICER
BSK
BS
\
HIGH COURT
DATED i02l,0U2025
t
' .::r s
; )i-
c) 2 I JAN 2020
1,)
t
ORDER
WP.No.11425 of 2006
CLOSINGI THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS J-<s lrn ,a l,
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Vasant Rao
The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Falaknuma Depot, Enginebowli, Hyderabad
The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Hyderabad City Region, Picket, Secunderabad
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
