E. Mallesh v. the Superintending Engineer Operation Circle and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging an employment memo was closed after counsel stated a fresh writ petition superseded it; no order as to costs.
Writ petition challenging an employment memo was closed after counsel stated a fresh writ petition superseded it; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 ]
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIRSTDAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICENAMAVARAPU RA.'ESHWARRAO
WRIT PETITION NO:1827 OF 2008
Between:
E. Mallesh, S/o. Sayanna,aged about54 y-ears, Occ:UDC,O/o Asst' Accounts Officer, ERo, Banswada,Nizamabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
. Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution oflndiaprayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiledtherewith, the Highcourt may be pleased to issue a writ, order or directionmore particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaririg theimpugned Memo No sE/oPMGL/JAO/ESII.U'1/4',ldt 8-1 1-2007issued by the 1st respondent and set- aside the same asillegal, arbitrary,andagainstthe Articles14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of lndia andconsequentlydeclare that the petitioner is entitled to continue in Servicepending disposal of the CrI A N o'14O412QO7with all consequential benefits andpass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit.
t'
l.A. NO : 1 0F 2008 TWPMP. NO: 2281 OF 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thC :ircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High C(,( rt may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned Memo NO. SE/OI) WGL/JAO/EsII.U 1/41 dt 8-11-2OO7 issued by the 1st respondent by directirc the respondents to continue the petitioner service pending disposal of the abor' ) Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.RAMGOPAL RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI A.CHANDRA SHAKER ;C FOR NPDCL The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESHUIARRAO WRIT PETITION No.1827 of 2OO8
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed to declare theimpugned Memo, dated 08. ll.2OO7 issued by the 1" respondentas illegal
4 . Recording the above submission,this Writ Petitionis closed. There shall be no orderas to costs.
Miscellaleous applications, if a.ny pending, sha1l also stand closed. Sd,.A.JAYASREE ISTANTRE SECTIONOFF ICER ,[RuEcoPYl' ul Advocate[O To, 1. OneCC to SRIM RAMGOPALRAO' PDCLTOPUCI CHANDRASHAKER, SC FOR N 2 OneCC to SRI A J TwoCDCOPiES BSR PMK
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0110912025
ORDER
WP.No.1827 of 2008
/a.'
..,/.
/ ..''
i1:
i't.t
Il I i:i 2925
.),1,
*
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION,
WITHOUT COSTS
rt\a/
2 provisions across 2 enactments
E. Mallesh
The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, Northern Power Distribution Company of A.P., Warangal
The Chief General Manager (HRD), Northern Power Distribution Company of A.P., Warangal
Northern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd.
Assistant Accounts Officer, Electricity Revenue Office, Banswada
Namavarapu Rajeshwarrao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court