Writ petition challenging promotion process of a grameena bank as arbitrary; dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated absence of petitioner's representation over multiple hearings.
None granted; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33041
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDE
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA.'ESHWAR RAO
Between:
P Kumar, S/o.P.V.Bhaskar Rao, Fl/o.H.No.1-3-13'l/40, RoadNo.9, (South), Near Maremma temple, Nirmal Post and Mandal, Adilabad 106.
...PETITIONER
D
3; R.Bharat Kumar, Branch Manager, Sri SaraswathiGrameenaBank, Bazarhatnoor Branch, Bazarhatnooi Mandal, Adilabaddistrict-SO4 299.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the promotion process for promotion to MMGS-ll from JMGS-I pursuant to the Circular No.Per/49/2004-05, dt.19-3-2005 and as ended by declaration of selected candidates in Circular No.Per/1 2/2005-06, dt.'t 7-5-2005 as arbitrary and illegal by issuing a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus and consequently to set aside the same and direct the 1"t and 2d respondents to reconduct the promotion process by duly announcing the Benchmark before commencement of the promotion process !.A NO: 1 OF 2005flt PMP.NOz 1742 OF 20051
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the promotions effected under Circular No.Per/1212005-06, dt.17-5-2005, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G. RAMA GOPAL
Counsel forthe Respondent No.l: SRI S. UDAYACHALA RAO AND MUJIB KUUAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI K. GOPALA KRISHNA MURTHY SC FOR SRI SARASWATHI GRAi'EENA BANK
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3tol9: SRI K. VASUDEVA REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
t
\
,
THEHoN,BLEsRIJUSTICENAMAVARAPURAJESHWARRAo
ORDER:
AtthetimeoffilingtheWritPetition,thepetitionerwas 44yearsofage. The matter pertains to the year 2005'
2..Thereliefsoughtbythepetitioneristosuspendthe promotions effectedunder CircularNo.Per/ t2l2oo5-06,dated 17.05.2005,
\
5, Learned counsel for the responcients submits that after ihe iiiing of the Vvr:t Petirion, two r-ouncls cf proniotions have taken place, and the said promotions have not been challenged.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in
this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
Sd/.A.JAYASREE
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To,
2 Effi EE3 q'$: r:Syffl,ids,f,tRfsF+3g,,ft 3. oil cc i;siii: s. uoavncxAlA'nno AND MUJrr ?rfif{:Io',?]"" loPUcI 4. One CC to SRt. K. VASUDEVA REDDy, Advocate [OpUC] 5. Two CD Copies
PMK
BM (r
HIGH COURT
DATED i0110912025
ORDER
WP.No.13735 of 2005
'tiiE Sl'4 r4:
t
.{.. 15 ILC M
-lr * {3
('f!/i j-t-, . . rrr.1l
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS t A- rt 1) ls I
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P. Kumar
Sri Saraswathi Grameena Bank, Adilabad District
The Promotion Selection Committee, Sri Saraswathi Grameena Bank
R. Bharat Kumar
Mohd. Naseeruddin
G. Shanker Goud
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
