Dismissed¶40

Md.Shakeel, Mahabubnagar v. the Regional Manager, Apsrtc, Mahabubnagar and Another

Telangana HC2 Sept 2025WP/19751/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; WP.No.19751 of 2007; Md.Shakeel v. Regional Manager APSRTC Mahabubnagar Region and Depot Manager APSRTC Atchampet Depot; Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao; decided 02-09-2025; dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed; compassionate grounds appointment; APSRTC; representations dated 5-7-2003 and 15-11-2006; writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC interim application (W.P. 2007 P. No. 25472 O); counsel K.VENKATESWERLLU for petitioner, B.G.UMA DEVI for respondents.

What did the court decide?

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition did not survive adjudication and that the Writ Petition had become infructuous; the Court proceeded on that submission. ¶25

Md.Shakeel, Mahabubnagar Vs the Regional Manager… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶7

WR F 7

¶8

Between:

¶9

Md.Shakeel, S/o. late Basheer Ahmed, aged about 25^years, Unemployee Rl/o H.No.8-127, Amarabad, Mahabubnagar (Dist.)

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Mahabubnagar Region, Mahabubnagar District.

¶13

The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Atchampet Depot, Atchampet, lvtahabubnagar District.

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court^{may be} pleased to issue a wrlt or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inactlon of the respondents in not considering^the case of petitioner for appointment any suitable^post under compassionate grounds as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural^justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider case of^{petitionerfor} appointment any suitable^post in the existing vacancies under compassionate grounds by considering his representations dated 5-7 -2003 and^'15-1 1-2006 and pass such orders as it may deem fit and^just.

¶16

F 2007 P. NO:25472 O

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the^petitioner for appointment^any

¶18

suitable^post under compassionate grounds in the existing vacancies^pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.VENKATESWERLLU

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: M/s. B.G.UMA DEVI

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO}

¶23

w ITP TIO N No. 1975,,^{of 2007}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Learned counsel^{for the petitioner submitsthat the cause in} the Writ Petition^{does not survivefor adjudication and the Writ} Petition has become^iniructuous.

¶26

ts Recording the above^{submission,this Writ Petition} ciismissed as^{infructuous. There shallbe no orcier as to costs'}

¶27

As a sequel,^{miscellaneous applications pending,if any,in this}

¶28

Writ Petition,^{shall standclosed.}

¶29

SD/. M. OSM I BAIG ASSlSTAN EGISTRAR

¶30

//TRUE COPY//

¶31

SECTION OFFICER