Retired IDPL employee sought payment of superannuation benefits and interest on leave encashment under Article 226, relying on an earlier judgment in W.P.No.22385 of 1997. Listed for dismissal for non-prosecution, the writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner was not interested in pursuing it, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33041
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPURAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 11280 OF 2004
Between:
Kuruba Karenna, S/o. S. Hanumanthappa, aged 62years,Occ: retd. Dy.lV'latertals Manager, in l.D.P.L. Balanagar, Hyderabad- 37, R/o: Flat No. 601,Raghavendra Towers, Gandhinagar Road, Opp IDPL Colony,Hyderabad -500037.
..,..PETITIONER
AND
...,.RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction essentiallyin the natureof Writ of tvANDAIVUS directing the respondentherein to paythe superannuatorybenefits to thepetitioner on the dateof relieve forthwith and also to direct payment of the interest for Leave Encashmenti.e. from 30-6-'1997 to May, 2002 on an amount of Rs. 83, 2241- or18Yoper annumand pass such other order or orders and l=other superannuation benefits and togrant suchother relief or reliefsto the petitioner as per Judgement of W.P.No.22385 ol 1997 dated 2nd April, '1998 as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproperin the circumstances of the case or else the petitioner will be put to great hardship and sufferirreparable loss.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2004(WPMP.NO:14350 oF 2004)
Petition Under Section 151 CPCpraying that in theci cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCotr t may be pleased to direct the respondent herein topay at least interest andl- rave Encashment i.e. from 30-6-1997 to May, 2002 on an amount ofRs. 83, 2il l/- as per Judgement passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 22385 of'1997 d;r ed 2nd April, 1998 to the petitioner herein.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K.V.BHANU PRAKASH
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI K.SRINIVASI /IURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI K,JAGADISHWAF TEDDY The Court made the following ORDER
TltE Hrii! BL= SRIjUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
WFI.I T Pi'',"irl(-ii'Ji'lc .,t i:i*r.j r"lF ?*L14
,f RDiR:
Ar lhe iinle cf liiir-,:rihe VJr-it Petltlon, the petitioner ^/as 52 yea!-s of age.The n-ratterpeftains to the year 2004'
J .,. . ), -1.a. ,-e ir a:: ''r-r:aiic i'i Ori;e he:i ;' "iion peri::cre r. lie.afrae-l'. e r,rartei was directedlo be listeci C1.09.2C25uncerthe csption"Fcr Dismissai"
r:!. .1<:.-..,'.1i ,-:<-tlil.-i ?ar,1 11 11i,' ,:i f.': .. -r:5- ;; ,-nY- j:'
i:'rig ri/i-!t Peiit;.ta 't:r..:li !tir.l ':lo:'::
//TRUE COPY//
*SD NIVASA R A( NT TRAR
To \sEcfloNoFFtCER 1. One CC to SRt K V.BHANU PRAKASH, Advocate [OP JC] 2. one CC ro SRt K.JAGADtSHW4l3fooi nj"""iil, OF,ucf 3 one CC to SRt K.SR|N|VASA VunrHV, nivt-.rti-1c r uC1 -, 4. Two CD Copies SA BS
str
i
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10912025
;B 1 TiE SIA
o
2 3 JAN 2026 I
.{.
t i,)/
's'.-_l- . Oc+^"* . ;-;-t.':.,.r/
ORDER
WP.No.11280 of 2004
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON - PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS,
6 I
"b
o<br>.>
ot
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interest on leave encashment and superannuation benefits should be paid to the retired employee as per an earlier judgment in W.P.No.22385 of 1997.
Kuruba Karenna
Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Hyderabad Unit, Balanagar, through its General Manager
Indian Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Limited, Corporate Office, IDPL Complex, Dundahera, Gurgaon
Union of India, Through its Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Chemicals Department
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
