“12. On careful scrutiny of the evidence available on record, I find that P.W.1 is the petitioner herself, P.W.2 is mother of informant and P.W.3 is cousin sister of petitioner and P.W.4 is an independent witness have fully proved the petitioner’s case. Petitioner has categorically proved case of willful neglect of the O.P. she has also proved that she has no source of her maintenance. The opposite party has willfully neglect to maintain either the petitioner or his child as a result the son of the petitioner could not get proper education in her small salary. The opposite party on the other hand admitted the case of the petitioner and stated in para-7 of her deposition that when petitioner was studying he had paid money in her study and also maintain entire expenses of her teacher training. Further in para 9 of her deposition admitted that if petitioner wants his help for the purpose of education of her son, he will ready to help her. It is also proved that opposite party did not pay any maintenance to the petitioner despite convening of PANCHAYAT. Witness also admitted that at present petitioner is suffering from illness. Marriage of petitioner Sunita Tudu with the opposite party Gaina Kisku is admitted by the witnesses of the petitioner and it is also admitted that petitioner along with her son Deepak Kisku are living separate from the opposite party since 12.12.2006. The petitioner has been able to prove that the opposite party has sound financial condition. She has claimed Rs. 15,000/- per month for herself and her minor son. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I find that
