Criminal Revision No. 786 of 2016, filed by Sujit Nandi challenging a maintenance order, was dismissed as the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition before the High Court of Jharkhand.
Criminal Revision No. 786 of 2016 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 786 of 2016
Sujit Nandi, S/o Sri Sasti Nandi, R/o 18/15, Tilak Road, B-Zone, Durgapur-5, P.O & P.S. Durgapur, Dist. Bardhman (W.B) … Petitioner
Versus
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Verdhan, A.P.P
04/24.01.2020
The petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 01.06.2016 passed in Maintenance Petition No. 315 of 2014 by which he has been directed to pay Rs. 6000/- per month to his wife besides Rs.5000/- in lump-sum as litigation cost.
Mr. Deepak Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision petition.
Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, the learned A.P.P appears for
the State.
Accordingly, Criminal Revision No. 786 of 2016 is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
Sujit Nandi
The State of Jharkhand
Papiya Nandi
Sri Ramesh Kundu
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
