Naresh Kumar v. Hrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3071 of 2009 Decided on: 14.05.2013
Naresh Kumar
...Petitioner.
Versus
HRTC & another
…Respondent.
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate.
Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral)
Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous. Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. The pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma) Judge
May 14, 2013 (rajni)
1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?
Naresh Kumar
HRTC
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court