The court disposed of a writ petition via a subsequent letter patent appeal and recalled an order dismissing an application due to the respondent's counsel's illness.
Order dated 15th May 2013 recalled; PET disposed of with liberty to approach again; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
COPC No. 794 of 2012
Date of Decision 21st May, 2013
| ______________________________ Rajesh Thakur & others |
_____________ | _____________ ….Petitioners |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| Goverdhan Singh and others ______________________________ |
_____________ |
….Respondents _____________ |
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
______________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate. _____________________________________________________________
Dev Darshan Sud, J.(oral)
CMP No. 639 of 2013
On the averments made in the application that learned counsel, Mr. Ashok Sharma, appearing for the respondent was taken ill and it is in these circumstances, he could not appear in this case, despite having been instructed by the respondents, this application is allowed and order dated 15th May 2013 is recalled.
CWP No. 794 of 2012
Petition is disposed of at this stage as it is submitted by learned Additional Advocate General that Letter Patent Appeal challenging the judgment passed in writ petition has been
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
instituted in this Court. Liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach again after decision in appeal. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
May 21, 2013(ms)
(Dev Darshan Sud), Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petition should be disposed of given the pendency of a Letter Patent Appeal.
Whether the application recalling a dismissal due to the advocate's illness should be allowed.
Rajesh Thakur and others
Goverdhan Singh and others
Dev Darshan Sud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
