The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of a writ petition (COPC No. 652 of 2012) noting that the petitioner could challenge a prior decision dated 28.06.2012. Notice was discharged, and the petition was disposed of by an oral order in May 2013.
Notice discharged; petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
COPC No. 652 of 2012
Decided on: 15th May, 2013
Karan Singh .......Petitioner.
Versus
N.L. Sharma
...Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1
For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Pramod Thakur, Addl. A.G with Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Addl.A.G and Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Dy. A.G.
Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral)
In sequel to our order dated 26.04.2013, it is submitted that a decision has already been taken on 28.06.2012. It will be open to the petitioner to assail the same in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of. Notice discharged.
(Rajiv Sharma) Judge May 15, 2013 (Dharam Chand Chaudhary) (naveen) Judge
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? Yes
Karan Singh
N.L. Sharma
Rajiv Sharma
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
