This short e.cop ordered the dismissal of the petitioner's application without detailed reasoning, noting no case was made out.
Petition dismissed; no case made out; Petitioner discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
COPC No. 760 of 2012 Decided on: 22nd May, 2013
Raj Kumari .......Petitioner.
Versus
Murari Lal
...Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Inder Dutt, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate.
Dev Darshan Sud, Judge (Oral)
Dismissed. No case made out. Notice
discharged.
(Dev Darshan Sud) Judge May 22, 2013 (Dharam Chand Chaudhary) (naveen) Judge
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition was maintainable.
Raj Kumari
Murari Lal
Dev Darshan Sud
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
