In a contempt petition, the court accepted that the directed order was complied with. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, notice discharged, and pending applications disposed of.
Petition dismissed; notice discharged; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No. 759 of 2012
Date of Decision 21st May, 2013 ________________________________________________________ Tilak Raj ….Petitioner Versus Rajinder Singh Rana ….Respondent ________________________________________________________
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
______________________________________________________________ For the Petitioner: Ms. Anjula Khajuria, Advocate. For Respondent No.1: Mr. Ashok Chaudhary, Additonal Advocate General with Mr.R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General.
Dev Darshan Sud, J.(oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General has been instructed in writing by the Officer on Special Duty Directorate of Sainik Welfare H.P., Hamirpur to submit that order stands complied with. Copy of communication has been placed on record of the case. This is not disputed by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Contempt petition stands disposed of. Notice is discharged. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Dev Darshan Sud), May 21, 2013(ms) Judge
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
Tilak Raj
Rajinder Singh Rana
Dev Darshan Sud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
