Four concurrent constitutional petitions were disposed of orally by the Hon'ble High Court of Himachal Pradesh. The court held that since the Electricity Board has preferred a Special Leave Petition against the impugned judgment, no order is passed in these proceedings at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC No. 342 of 2011 alongwith COPC No. 343 of 2011, COPC No. 344 of 2011 and COPC No. 345 of 2011.
Date of Decision : May 9 , 2013
1. COPC No. 342 of 2011 Rajesh Kumar
…Petitioner
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sh. M. P. Sood (Secretary | HPSEB) & others |
…Respondents |
| 2. COPC No. 343 of 2011 Bhagat Ram |
…Petitioner | |
| Versus | ||
| Sh. M. P. Sood (Secretary | HPSEB Ltd.) and others |
…Respondents |
| 3. COPC No. 344 of 2011 Rakesh Kumar |
…Petitioner | |
| Versus | ||
| Sh. M. P. Sood (Secretary | HPSEB Ltd.) and others |
…Respondents |
| 4. COPC No. 345 of 2011 Geeta Ram |
…Petitioner | |
| Versus | ||
| Sh. M. P. Sood (Secretary | HPSEB Ltd.) and others |
…Respondents |
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh, Judge.
For the petitioner : Ms. Shweta Joolka, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
2
For the respondents : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Mehar Chand, Advocate, for respondent No. 1 (in all the petitions).
Mr. Rajpal Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 and 3 (in all the petitions).
Sanjay Karol, J. (Oral)
Undisputedly the Electricity Board Limited has preferred a Special Leave Petition against the judgment in question. Under these circumstances, we refrain from passing any orders in these proceedings save and except that it shall be open for the petitioner(s) to approach the Court if need so arises after the decision of the Special Leave Petition.
With the aforesaid observations, present petitions stand disposed
of, so also the pending applications, if any.
(Sanjay Karol), Judge.
(Kuldip Singh), May 9 , 2013 (PK) Judge.
Rajesh Kumar
Sh. M. P. Sood (Secretary HPSEB)
Bhagat Ram
Rakesh Kumar
Geeta Ram
Sanjay Karol
Kuldip Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
