This order states that since the respondent has challenged the decree in the Supreme Court, the instant petition is disposed of with liberty to approach competent jurisdiction after the final decision.
Petition disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach appropriate court after decision in the SLP.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
COPC No. 168 of 2009.
Date of Decision: 3rd May, 2013.
_________________________________________________________ Gian Chand …….Petitioner. Versus Amarnath …Respondent. _________________________________________________________ Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
| _____________________ For the petitioner: |
____________________________________ Mr. Paresh Sharma, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : _____________________ |
Nemo. ____________________________________ |
Dev Darshan Sud, J. (oral)
It is undisputed before me that the respondent has filed Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court challenging the decree in the second appeal.
In these circumstances, it would be in the fitness of things that this petition is disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach court of competent jurisdiction after the decision in the special leave petition. Ordered accordingly.
3rd May, 2013. (Dev Darshan Sud), (jai) Judge
1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Gian Chand
Amarnath
Dev Darshan Sud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
