Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a writ petition direction. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that compliance had been made by an order dated 05.08.2024 issued by the Secretary, BTC, and sought closure. The court closed the contempt petition and made the compliance order part of the record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010239922022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/667/2022
CHANDAN DAS S/O- LATE KAMAL CH. DAS R/O- VILLAGE BIJNI P.O AND P.S- BIJNI DIST- CHIRANG ASSAM PIN-783390
VERSUS
ANURAG GOEL AND ANR. IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR-783370
2:SHRI AKASH DEEP IASPRINCIPAL SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COOUNCIL KOKRAJHAR-783370.
-----------Advocate for : MR. U K NAIR Advocate for : MR. D SAIKIA (R-2) appearing for ANURAG GOEL AND ANR.
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 06.08.2024
Mr. A. Boro, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the order dated 05.08.2024, issued by the Secretary, BTC, in compliance with the order passed in the writ petition, the contempt petition can
Page No.# 2/2
be closed.
Mr. P. Hazarika, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mrs. R. B. Bora, learned counsel for the BTC.
In view of the submission of the petitioner’s counsel, the contempt petition stands closed.
The order dated 05.08.2024, issued by the Secretary, BTC, is made a part of the record and marked as Annexure-X.
Comparing Assistant
Chandan Das
Anurag Goel, IAS, Principal Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council
Shri Akash Deep, IAS, Principal Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
