Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with a Court direction in WP(C) 4058/2023 was closed after counsel for the petitioner confirmed compliance and respondents did not dispute it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010077412024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/196/2024
MONOWAR HUSSAIN S/O- LATE HAJI MATLEB HUSSAIN, R.O - SUAPATA PART - IV , P.O - SUAPATA, P.S - BILASIPARA, DIST - DHUBRI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
DIBAKAR NATH, IAS AND ANR. DEPUTY COMMISSSIONER, DHUBRI, P.O - DHUBRI, DIST - DHUBRI, ASSAM. PIN- 783301.
2:SARI LALROUTKIM LUGNTAU ACS CIRCLE OFFICER BILASIPARA REVENUE CIRCLE
P.O - BILASIPARA DIST - DHUBRI ASSAM. PIN- 783348
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR M A ISLAM,
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-2), MS. N BORDOLOI(R-1),MR. D SAIKIA(R1),MS. N BORDOLOI (R-2)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
ORDER
Date : 05.08.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction submits that the direction passed by this Court vide order dated 24.07.2023 in WP(C) 4058/2023 has been complied with.
The above position is not disputed by the learned counsel for the respondents.
In view of the above, the order having been complied with, the present Contempt Petition stands closed.
A copy of the order dated 02.07.2024 produced by the parties is kept on record and marked as document “X”.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the direction issued by the Court in WP(C) 4058/2023 had been complied with, permitting closure of the contempt petition.
MONOWAR HUSSAIN
DIBAKAR NATH, IAS
SARI LALROUTKIM LUGNTAU
N. Unni Krishnan Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
