The Gauhati High Court closed the contempt petition based on the advice of the petitioner's counsel. A relevant order dated 05.08.2024 by the BTC Secretary was incorporated into the record as Annexure-X.
Contempt petition closed; order dated 05.08.2024 marked as record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010231702022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/639/2022
CHARAN BORGAYARY
S/O- LATE NIBARAN BORGAYARY, VILL.- BALLAMGURI, P.O. BALLAMGURI, P.S. BIJNI, DIST.CHIRANG, BTAD, ASSAM, PIN- 783393.
VERSUS
ANURAG GOEL AND ANR.
PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL, KOKRAJHAR-783370.
2:SHRI AKASH DEEP IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR-783370
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K NAIR, MRS. S P NAIR,MR. A BORO,MS. D MAHANTA,MR A CHETIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-2), MR. S R RABHA (R-2),MS. R B BORA (R-2)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 06.08.2024
Mr. A. Boro, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in view of the order dated 05.08.2024, issued by the Secretary, BTC, in compliance with the order passed in the writ petition, the contempt petition can
Page No.# 2/2
be closed.
Mr. P. Hazarika, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mrs. R. B. Bora, learned counsel for the BTC.
In view of the submission of the petitioner’s counsel, the contempt petition stands closed.
The order dated 05.08.2024, issued by the Secretary, BTC, is made a part of the record and marked as Annexure-X.
Comparing Assistant
CHARAN BORGAYARY
ANURAG GOEL
BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
