The petition stood closed with liberty to file afresh due to counsel's inability to communicate with the client and lack of service on respondents.
Liberty to file the same afresh if the cause of action persists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010099922022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/295/2022
KOWSAR AHMED LASKAR
S/O LATE FOZLUL HOQUE LASKAR, R/O WARD NO. 1, P.O.-VICHINGCHA, DIST- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-788155
VERSUS
RAKESH KUMAR AND ANR
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (APDCL), BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTAN BAZAR, GUWAHATI-01
2:BHASKAR JYOTI BORA THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HR) APDCL BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTAN BAZAR GUWAHATI-0
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A B T HAQUE,
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
05.08.2024
Mr. A.B.T. Haque, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has not
Page No.# 2/2
been able to communicate with the petitioner.
The office note indicates that there is no return of A/D card or unserved notice from the respondents.
On considering the fact that the counsel for the petitioner has not been able to communicate with his client, the contempt petition stands closed with liberty to file the same afresh, if the cause of action persists.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of due to non-communication with the petitioner?
KOWSAR AHMED LASKAR
RAKESH KUMAR
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (APDCL)
BHASKAR JYOTI BORA THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HR) APDCL
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
