The Gauhati High Court closed a contempt petition on the representation that the order in WP(C) 3585/2021 had been complied with. No substantive disposal of the merits is provided in this order.
The contempt petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010233872023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/640/2023
M/S EASTERN AGRO MARKETING AGENCIES
A PROPRIETORIAL FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 257 SREE MANTA MARKET, A T ROAD, GUWAHATI-1, ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI ASHOK KUMAR JAIN.
VERSUS
DILIP KUMAR BORAH AND 2 ORS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HANDLOOM, TEXTILES AND SERICULTURE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY6.
2:SAMIR SINHA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GHY-6.
3:PARAGMONI MAHANTA DIRECTOR OF HANDLOOM AND TEXTILES ASSAM G.N.B. ROAD AMBARI GHY-781001
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R K DUTTA, MR. U J SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR A CHALIHA (r-2), MR P NAYAK (r-2),MR. B GOGOI (r-2)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
07.08.2024
Ms. M. Das, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; Mr. R. Dhar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 & 3 and Mr. A. Chaliha, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 submit that the contempt petition can be closed, as the order passed in WP(C) 3585/2021 has been complied with.
In view of the submissions made by the counsels for the parties, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/S Eastern Agro Marketing Agencies
Dilip Kumar Borah
Samir Sinha
Paragmoni Mahanta
Michael Zothankhuma
Comparing Assistant
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
