Dismissed
Gautam Kumar Baishya v. Sri Shamsher Singh and Ors.
Gauhati HCCont.Cas(C)/792/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010027422015 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010027422015 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010027422015
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/792/2015
GAUTAM KUMAR BAISHYA
S/O SRI KAMESWAR BAISHYA, VILL. and P.O. MOROWA, P.O. and DISTNALBARI, ASSAM
VERSUS
SRI SHAMSHER SINGH and ORS. COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6
2:BABULAL SARMA DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19
3:SRI BIJOY BAISHNAB
INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NALBARI DISTRICT CIRCLE NALBARI ASSAM.
4:PHANINDRA JUDUNG
DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19.
5:SRI SHAMSER SINGH
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPARTMENT DISPUR
Page No.# 2/2
GUWAHATI-6.
6:SRI BIJOY BAISHNAB INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NALBARI DISTRICT CIRCLE NALBARI ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.K DEVI
Advocate for the Respondent : MR.P SAIKIAR
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 10-03-2023
Ms. K. Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this contempt petition, the petitioner has got the desired relief. Accordingly, the matter has become infructuous.
Hence, this matter stands dismissed on having been rendered infructuous.
Mr. S. Saikia, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 is present.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Gautam Kumar Baishya
Shamsheer Singh
Babulal Sarma
Bijoy Baishnab
Phanindrudhat Judung
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court