This is a one-line order in a contempt petition. It states that the petitioner has been superannuated during the pendency of the petition, rendering the matter infructuous, and declares the matter closed. No substantive judgment or disposition was provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010039452019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/105/2019
DHARMESWAR DEKA
S/O- LATE GOLAP CHANDRA DEKA, VILL-SEPKUCHI, P.O. MAHAJANPARA, DIST.- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781366.
VERSUS
MADHAB CHANDRA DEKA THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL, K.D.C., KAMRUP(R), PIN- 781104.
2:SRI APURBA KR.THAKURIA THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOL Kamrup District.Circle KAMRUP(R) PIN-78110
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D DEKA
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 10-03-2023
Mr. D. Deka, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this contempt petition, the petitioner has been superannuated and therefore the matter has become infructuous.
Page No.# 2/2
Accordingly, the matter stands closed on having been rendered
infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
DHARMESWAR DEKA
MADHAB CHANDRA DEKA
KALYAN RAI SURANA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
