Dismissed
Murtaza Alom Laskar v. Laya Madduri and Anr.
Gauhati HCCont.Cas(C)/359/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010130152019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010130152019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010130152019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/359/2019
MURTAZA ALOM LASKAR
S/O- LT MOZAMMIL ALI LASKAR,, VILL- NAGDIRGRAM, PT-III, P.O. KABUGONJ, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
LAYA MADDURI AND ANR. THE CHAIRMAN, THE DIST. LEVEL COMMITTEE, CACHAR (FOR COMPASSIONATE APPOINTMENT) CUM DY. COMMISSIONER, CACHAR, P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM
2:SUMITRA DEV THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER CACHAR P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. S R BORUAH, GA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 13.03.2023
Both sides are duly represented.
Page No.# 2/2
Upon instruction, Ms. A. Begum, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got the desired relief and therefore, this matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the matter stands dismissed having been rendered infructuous.
Mr. S.R. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 is present.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Murtaza Alom Laskar
Laya Madduri and Ors.
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court