This order closed a contempt petition after the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a previous order dated 08.06.2022 was complied with during pendency. No substantive legal ruling or relief is detailed.
None specified; petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010181662022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/516/2022
MANORAMA RAI @ MANOROMA RAI W/O- SHAYLENDRA RAI,
R/O- VILLAGE URAL LAFLONG, BARUABARI, DAMORA PATHAR, P.O AND P.S- SONAPUR,
DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-782402
VERSUS
GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI , IAS
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND DISASTER DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R Deka
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
14.03.2023
Shri S.I. Akand, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this petition, the order dated 08.06.2022 passed in
Page No.# 2/2
WP(C)/5555/2021 has been complied with.
Also heard Shri J. Handique, learned counsel for the respondent.
In view of the above submission and development, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Manorama Rai @ Manoroma Rai
Gyanendra Dev Tripathi
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
