Contempt petition closed and disposed of on the submission that the order in the connected writ petition had been complied with by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040014892022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 48/2022
1:M/s Amrang Enterprise and Anr.
Office at Palin, PO/PS Palin, District Kra Daadi, PIN 791118, Arunachal Pradesh.
2: Takam Yabang Proprietor of M/s Amrang Enterprise PO/PS Palin Kra Daadi District A
VERSUS
1:Hage Bida and 2 Ors.
Chief Engineer, Public Work Department (P.W.D), GoAP, Central Zone A, Mowb II, Itanagar, Papum Pare DIstrict, AP 791111
2:Robin Nani Superintending Engineer Yachuli Civil Circle Yachuli
Lower Subansiri District 791120 (AP)
3:Gollo Tagar Executive Engineer PWD Jamin Division PO/PS Palin Kra Daadi District AP 79111
Advocate for the Petitioner : Sunil Mow
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 16.03.2023
Ms. Neelam Yaje, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the order passed by the Court in the connected writ petition, has been complied with by the respondents.
In view of the submission as made above by Ms. Yaje, learned counsel for the petitioners; the contempt petition stands closed and accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/s Amrang Enterprise and Anr
Hage Bida and 2 Ors
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
