Dismissed
Nabam Budh v. the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission and 5 Ors.
Gauhati HCWP(C)/207/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC040006832022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC040006832022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040006832022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 207/2022
1:Nabam Budh S/o Nabam Takia, Resident of Leporiang, PO/PS Sagalee, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh. Phone No. 8729901715
VERSUS
1:the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission and 5 Ors.
Through the Secretary, Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, Itanagar.
2:The Secretary Arunachal Pradesh Service Commission Itanagar.
3:The Secretary Department of Hydro Power Development (DHPD) Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
4:The Secretary
Public Works Department (PWD). Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
5:The Secretary Department of PHE and Water Supply Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar.
6:The Secretary
Page No.# 2/2
Water Resource Department Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar
Advocate for the Petitioner : Dicky Panging
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 15.03.2023
Mr. D. Panging, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructous.
In view of above, writ petition stands dismissed as infructous.
Interim order passed earlier, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Nabam Budh
Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court