The Gauhati High Court closed and disposed of a contempt petition. The court accepted the respondent's submission that a prior order was complied with, which was not objected to by the petitioner's counsel.
Contempt petition stands closed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040014072022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 42/2022
1:Ennyo Nangkar Son of Atang Nangkar,
Director, Land Management (U/s), a resident of C Sector, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. 791111 and a permanent resident of Gosang Village, PO and PS Jengging, District Upper Siang, Arunachal Pradesh. 919436059541
VERSUS
1:Naresh Kumar,IAS and Anr. Chief Secretary, Govt. of A.P. Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat, Itanagar.
2:Pankaj Kumar Jha IAS Secretary Land Management Govt. of AP. Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Itanagar
Advocate for the Petitioner : Muk Pertin, Senior Advocate
Advocate for the Respondent : Mipe Ete
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 16.03.2023
Heard Ms. Tsering Yangzom Bhutia, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Mepe Ete, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that the order passed by the Court in the connected writ petition, has been complied with by the respondents.
The submission as made above by Mr. Ete, learned counsel for the respondents, has not been objected to by Ms. Bhutia, learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, the contempt petition stands closed and accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ennyo Nangkar
Naresh Kumar
Pankaj Kumar Jha
Nani Tagia
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
