Mirpe Tato v. the State of Ap and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner an APCS Sr. Grade officer, applied for promotion kept in sealed cover due to pending criminal case. Court held petitioner merits ad-hoc promotion consideration under Clause-5 of OM dated 14.09.1992.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent authorities to consider petitioner's case for ad-hoc promotion under Clause-5 of OM dated 14.09.1992.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/6
GAHC040002702022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 98/2022
1:Mirpe Tato S/o Late Bimir Tato,
Village Yaki Tato, PO/PS Kamba, District West Siang, Arunachal Pradesh and presently serving as EAC (APCS) Sr. Grade.
VERSUS
1:THE STATE OF AP and Anr.
Represented by its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar 791111
2:The Secretary (Department of Personnel) to the Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Civil Secretariat Itanagar 79111
Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to ad-hoc promotion despite pending proceedings.
Whether the appointing authority should consider the Clause-5 of Office Memorandum dated 14.09.1992.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MIRPE TATO
- respondent
THE STATE OF AP AND ANR
Coram
NANI TAGIA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/98/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court