A contempt petition was withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to file an appropriate application, and the petition was closed.
Petition for withdrawal allowed; contempt petition closed with liberty to file appropriate application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010041002022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/111/2022
BHUPEN KUMAR SAHARIA AND ANR
S/O LATE PRADIP SAHARIA, VILL-BHUKBARI, P.O. AND P.S.-SIPAJHAR, DIST-DARRANG, PIN-784145
2: INTAZ ALI
S/O LATE AKIBAR RAHMAN VILL-NIZDALA P.O.-MESKAPUKHURI P.S.-KALAIGAON DIST-UDALGURI PIN-78452
VERSUS
ANURAG GOEL AND 2 ORS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL, BODOFA NAGAR, P.O. AND DIST-KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783370
2:AMAR JYOTI BARMAN SECRETARY (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT) BODOFA NAGAR P.O. AND DIST-KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN-783370
3:JAY PRAKASH BRAHMA DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR C/O O/O THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR STATION ROAD KOKRAJHAR BTAD
Page No.# 2/2
ASSAM PIN-78337
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent :
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
08-08-2022
Mr. R.A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of this contempt petition with liberty to file an appropriate application.
Prayer is allowed.
Contempt petition is accordingly closed, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
BHUPEN KUMAR SAHARIA AND ANR
ANURAG GOEL AND 2 ORS
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
