The Tribunal allowed the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the main appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the pre-deposit amount was ordered to be returned.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pre-deposit amount to be returned to the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 121 of 2023
(Arising out of S.A. 290 of 2019 DRT 3 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
Order No.19 13.03.2024
Sri Tarun Chakraborty
… Appellant Vs.
UCO Bank
….. Respondent
For Appellant : Mr. Samik Basu, Ld. adv. For Respondent : Ms. Sanjukra Roy, ld. Adv.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. No. 114 of 2024 is a put up application. I.A. is disposed
of.
I.A. No. 115 of 2024 is an application for withdrawing the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that bank will return the documents during the course of the day.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for respondent appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal.
O R D E R
Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Registry is directed to return the pre-deposit amount in accordance with law. I.A. 115 of 2024 stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record room.
Copy of the order be supplied to the appellant and the respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
Copy of the judgement/Final Order be uploaded in the Tribunal’s website.
Order dictated, signed and pronounced by me in the open Court on this the 13th day of March, 2024.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava, J) Chairperson
Dated : 13.03.2024
05 /pkb
Sri Tarun Chakraborty
UCO Bank
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
