In a single-line interim order, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal adjourned a stay application by maintaining status quo and directed parties to file opposition/rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 26 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. 290 of 2019 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.6.2022 Tarun Chakraborty … Appellant -VsUCO Bank … Respondent Mr. Samik Basu with Mr. Kaushik Das, Learned Counsel for Appellant Ms. Sanjukta Ray, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed by the Respondent; taken on record. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks.
Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that they
may be ousted if the impugned order is not stayed.
Having considered the submissions, parties are directed to maintain status quo till the next date of listing.
List the matter on 5th September, 2022 for disposal of Stay application, I.A. 25 of 2022.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 28th July, 2022 06/ac
Tarun Chakraborty
UCO Bank
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
