Tarun Chakraborty v. Uco Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 26 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. 290 of 2019 in DRT-3, Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
22.6.2022 Tarun Chakraborty … Appellant -VsUCO Bank … Respondent Mr. Kaushik Das, led by Mr. Samik Basu, Learned Counsel for Appellant Ms. Sanjukta Ray, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
I.A. 24 of 2022
I.A. 224 of 2020 is a put up application. The matter being taken up, the I.A. 24 of 2022 stands disposed of.
Affidavit-of-service filed today shows service upon Respondents No. 3 and 4 is not sufficient.
Service upon Respondents No. 3 and 4 be carried out by way of paper publication to be published in two widely circulated local daily newspapers; one in English and the other in vernacular and file affidavit-of-service before the next date of listing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tarun Chakraborty
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court