Tarun Chakraborty v. Uco Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal Dy No. 26 of 2022
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
20.03.2023
Sri Tarun Chakraborty
… Appellant
-Vs-
UCO Bank
… Respondents
Mr. S Basu, ld. Counsel and Mr. K Das, ld. Counsel for the appellant. Mr. A. D. Roy, ld. Counsel with Ms. S. Ray, ld. Counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed waiver application on 21.12.2022, copy of the same was served upon the respondent. Application for waiver is not on record. Registry is directed to place the waiver application on record.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Tarun Chakraborty
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court