Tarun Chakraborty v. Uco Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Dy No. 26 of 2022
(Arising out of SA No. 290 of 2019 in DRT-3 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
17.11.2022 Sri Tarun Chakrabarty … Appellant -vsUCO Bank … Respondent Mr. Samik Basu, Learned Counsel Mr. Kaushik Das, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Atish Dipankar Roy, Ms. Sanjukta Roy, Learned Counsel for the Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
At the very outset Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 and 2 submits that the Appellants have not filed any application for waiver. Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for and granted two week’s time to move proper application. Copy of the same be also served upon the Respondents who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
List on 4th January, 2023. Interim order shall remain in force till the next date of hearing.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 17th November, 2022 /tp
Parties & counsel
- appellant
TARUN CHAKRABARTY
- respondent
UCO BANK
Coram
ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court