Uco Bank v. Mampi Timbers And Hardware Pvt. Ltd.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 18 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. No.43 of 2021 in DRT-2 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
31.01.2023 UCO Bank … Appellant -VsMampi Timbers and Hardware Pvt. Ltd. ….Respondents Mr. S.N Patra Bhatta, Learned Counsel, Mr. Arjun Mukherjee, Learned Counsel , Ms. Sucharita Sil, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Ranajit Chowdhury, Learned Counsel for the Respondent Mr. Ratul Das, Learned Counsel Mr. P. Bose, Learned Counsel for the intervenor.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
An order was passed on 24.11.2022 asking the authorized officer to file personal affidavit explaining the reasons as mentioned in the order dated 24.11.2022. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that due to inadvertence, affidavit could not be filed. He prays for one day time to file the affidavit. Already more than two months time have been granted to the concerned authorized officer to file the affidavit which was not done. It shows the non-
2
compliance of the orders which could not be appreciated. In stead of referring the matter to the higher authorities of the Bank for taking appropriate action against the concerned authorized officer, I found it appropriate that the concerned authorized officer should be asked to appear in person and file the personal affidavit as he failed to file the same today. List on 8th February, 2023.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant should be granted time to file the personal affidavit of the authorized officer.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
UCO Bank
- respondent
Mampi Timbers and Hardware Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court