Punjab National Bank v. Bolin Chetia
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 06 of 2016
(Arising out of SA 37 of 2013 in DRT- Guwahati)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
30.01.2023
Punjab National Bank
… Appellant -VsBolin Chetia
… Respondents
Ms. A. Rao, ld. Counsel for the bank. Mr. Prasenjit Pal, Learned Counsel for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that Mr. Prasenjit Pal, ld. Counsel is appearing for respondent. Mr. Pal’s name is not printed in the cause list. Let his name be printed in the cause list as counsel for respondent.
Later - Mr. Prasenjit Pal, ld. Counsel, appears for respondent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
Bolin Chetia
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court