K Vishnu Murthy v. Central Bank of INdia
Case brief
What is this about?
A one-line order granting an adjournment for two weeks to file a supplementary affidavit in an appeal before the DRAT at Kolkata, noting service of summons on the respondents.
What did the court decide?
Two weeks time granted to file supplementary affidavit; respondent served but not represented.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Dy. No. 603 of 2022)
(Arising out of S.A. No. 295 of 2017 in DRT-1 Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
30.01.2023
K. Vishnu Murthy … Appellant -VsCentral Bank of India & Anr ….Respondents Mr. Nimani Srinivas, Learned Counsel for the Appellant Mr. Santosh Kr. Roy, Learned Counsel, Ms. Rituparna Sanyal, Learned Counsel, Ms. Sumona Mukherjee, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned Counsel for the Appellant prays for and granted two week’s time to file the supplementary affidavit with copy to the Respondent who may file counter if any, within a week thereafter.
List on 1st March, 2023 for disposal of I.A. No. 404 of 2022. Affidavit of service filed is taken on record. Respondent No. 2 is served but not represented.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K. Vishnu Murthy
- respondent
Central Bank of India
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court