Punjab National Bank v. M/ S Classic Flour Mills and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant sought adjournment due to counsel's unavailability. Respondent argued appeal against consent order is not maintainable. Bench adjourned matter for hearing on 07.02.2024.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 22/2019 Date: 28.11.2023
Punjab National Bank Vs. M/s Classic Flour Mills and Ors. Present: Shri A. K. Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjai Singh, counsel for the appellant, Shri Krishna Manohar Tiwari, counsel for the respondent No. 4, Shri V. K. Shukla, counsel for the respondent No. 5,
A mention has been made on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant that the arguing counsel Shri Sanjai Singh is busy before the Hon’ble High Court, therefore, he is unable to appear before this Tribunal today, hence he prays for adjournment on his behalf.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the present appeal has been filed against the consenting order, therefore, the appeal is not maintainable.
As prayed, list this case on 07.02.2024 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal against a consent order is maintainable.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
M/s Classic Flour Mills and Ors.
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court