Shobhram@Subey Singh v. Indian Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tennessee Valley Tribunal issued directions to the Presiding Officer, DRT, Lucknow, to expeditiously decide a pending statutory appeal within three months of producing the certified copy of the order.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Presiding Officer, DRT, Lucknow to decide S.A. No. 728/2023 within three months.
What the court decided
Application Dy. No. 1498/2023 Date: 28.11.2023
Shobhram @ Subey Singh Vs. Indian Bank
Present: Shri Amit Kumar Chaudhary, counsel for the applicant,
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant has filed the present misc. application for direction to the Presiding Officer, DRT, Lucknow to decide the S.A. No. 728/2023 within the time as stipulated by this Tribunal.
In view of the above, the present application stands disposed off with direction upon the Presiding Officer, DRT, Lucknow to consider and decide the S.A. No. 728/2023, which is stated to be pending, in accordance with law most expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction should be issued to the Presiding Officer, DRT, Lucknow, to decide a pending statutory application within a specified timeframe.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shobhram @ Subey Singh
- other
Indian Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · LD Registrar
- Order 2 — this page · Rajesh Dayal Khare
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court