M S Radient Bastralaya v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
TheDebts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, listed the appeal for hearing and directed the bank officer to appear in person to explore settlement of a petty recovery amount.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 18 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. 84 of 2021 in DRT-3 Kolkata)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
16.11.2022
M/s. Radient Bastralaya & Ors.
… Appellants
-Vs-
UCO Bank & Anr.
… Respondents
Mr. Anup Mukhopadhyay, learned counsel with Ms. S. Pal, ld. Counsel for the Appellant.
Mr. Samrat Mukherjee, learned counsel for the respondent.
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Radient Bastralaya & Ors.
- respondent
UCO Bank & Anr.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court