The Appellant Bank withdrew the appeal under instructions. The Appeals Tribunal dismissed the appeal as 'Not pressed' without adjudicating the merits of the underlying banking dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 36 of 2020)
(Arising out of S.A. 82 of 2019 in DRT, Cuttack)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
16.11.2022 Canara Bank … Appellant -VsLakshmi Nrusingha Traders & Another … Respondents Ms. Aparajita Rao, Learned Counsel for Appellant None for Respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Ms. Aparajita Rao, Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that Appellant Bank does not want to press the matter and endorses in the Memo of Appeal that she is withdrawing the appeal under instruction of the Appellant Bank.
In view of the above submission, the appeal, being Appeal No. 36 of 2020, is dismissed as ‘Not pressed’.
Copy of the order be supplied to Appellant and the Respondents and a copy be also forwarded to the concerned DRT.
File be consigned to Record room.
Order dictated, signed, dated and pronounced in open Court.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 16th November, 2022
04/ac
Canara Bank
Lakshmi Nrusingha Traders & Another
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
