M S Radient Bastralaya v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Kolkata recorded the respondent's late-filed opposition subject to a condition for depositing Rs. 5,000 as costs with the State Legal Services authority within three weeks, and listed the matter for hearing on 04.08.2023.
What did the court decide?
Opposition recorded conditionally upon deposit of Rs. 5,000 as costs within three weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appl. No. 18 of 2021
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, CHAIRPERSON
21.06.2023
M/s. Radient Bastralaya & Ors.
… Appellants Vs.
UCO Bank & Anr.
….. Respondents
For Appellant : Mr. Anup Mukhopadhyay, ld. Counsel. For Respondent : Mr. Smrat Chowdhury, ld. Counsel
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Opposition filed today by the respondent after long lapse of time granted. Accordingly, opposition will be taken on record subject to payment of Rupees five thousand as costs to be deposited to the State Legal Services authority within three weeks.
List the matter on 04.08.2023 for hearing of appeal.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether opposition filed late by respondent is maintainable.
Whether costs may be imposed for filing opposition after lapse of time.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Radient Bastralaya & Ors.
- respondent
UCO Bank & Anr.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court