M S Radient Bastralaya v. Uco Bank
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Appeal No. 18 of 2021
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
04.08.2023 M/s. Radient Bastralaya … Appellant
-VsUCO Bank … Respondent
Mr. Anup Mukhopadhyay, Learned Counsel for Appellant
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the revised list. Learned Counsel for Appellant is present, none for the Respondent.
In compliance of the order dated 21st June, 2023 costs imposed are not deposited to the State Legal Services.
Let notices be sent by the Registry to the General Manager, UCO Bank, asking him to depute a competent officer to appear before this Appellate Tribunal to explain as to why order dated 21st June, 2023 is not complied.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Radient Bastralaya
- respondent
UCO Bank
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court