Appellate Tribunal allowed an application for restoration of an appeal after finding that defects previously pointed out by the Registrar had been removed by the appellant's counsel. The order dated 7th July, 2022 was set aside.
Application for restoration allowed; impugned order dated 7.7.2022 set aside; case listed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
M.A. Diary No. 385 of 2022
(Arising out of S.A. 220 of 2019 in DRT, Visakhapatnam)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
15.11.2022 Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill … Appellant -VsThe Authorised Officer, State Bank of India & 2 Others … Respondents
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
For Admission
This is an application for restoration of the appeal after setting aside the order dated 7th July, 2022 passed by the Learned Registrar.
Perusing the record I find that the defects, as pointed out by the Learned Registrar on 24th March, 2022, have been removed by the Learned Counsel for the Appellant.
Accordingly, M.A. Diary No. 385 of 2022 is allowed and the order dated 7th July, 2022, passed by the Learned Registrar is set aside.
List on 4th January, 2023 for Admission.
(Anil Kumar Srivastava,J) Chairperson
Dated: 15th November, 2022 06/ac
Prasanna Anjaneya Raw and Boiled Rice Mill
The Authorised Officer, State Bank of India
2 Others
Anil Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
