M S Radient Bastralaya v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
A matter listed for future hearing where time was granted to file opposition. No decision was rendered in this order as it is purely procedural.
What did the court decide?
Time granted to file opposition with advance copy.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Appeal No. 18 of 2021)
(Arising out of S.A. 84 of 2021 in DRT-3 Kolkata )
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA CHAIRPERSON
21.12.2022
M/s. Radient Bastralaya & Ors
… Appellants
-Vs-
UCO Bank & Anr.
… Respondents
Mr. Anup Mukhopadhyay, ld. counsel for the appellant. Mr. Samrat Chowdhury, learned counsel for the respondent
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Learned counsel for respondent prays for and granted three weeks time to file opposition with advance copy to the appellant who may file rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Radient Bastralaya & Ors.
- respondent
UCO Bank & Anr.
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court