The petitioner withdrew the writ petition and stated an intention to avail remedies under the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13.
RAJESHBHAI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Parvinder Chauhan, Mr. Nisarg Jain & Mr. Niraj Jain, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jamal Akhtar and Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocates for Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
O R D E R
% 10.01.2018 Crl. M.A. No.563/2018 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(CRL.) 95/2018
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the petition. He states that the petitioner shall avail of his remedy under the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Dasti.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
P.S. TEJI, J
JANUARY 10, 2018
B.S. Rohella
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can withdraw the present writ petition and proceed under the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
RAJESHBHAI
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
VIPIN SANGHI
P.S. TEJI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
