Disposed
Ravi @ Bire v. State
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/59/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Crl. M.A. allows detailed status report on surety; jails to produce petitioner; matter listed for next date. No substantive decision on bail.
What did the court decide?
Directed filing of detailed status report; directed Superintendent, Mandoli Jail to produce petitioner; listed for further hearing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
31# $~
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
| + W.P.(CRL) 59/20 |
18 | |
|---|---|---|
| RAVI @ BIRE | Represented by: | ..... Petitioner Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Sethi, Advocate. |
| versus | ||
| STATE | ..... Respondent | |
| Represented by: | Ms. Kamna Vohra, Additional Standing Counsel for State with |
|
| SI Neeraj Kumar, PS Gazipur. |
¶4
CORAM:
¶5
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
¶6
O R D E R
¶7
% 26.07.2018
¶8
Crl. M.A. No. 4860/2018 (modification)
¶9
- By this application the petitioner seeks modification of the order dated 9th January, 2018 and release on personal bond or depositing cash surety.
¶10
- Though status report has been filed, a further detailed status report will be filed indicating where the sisters of the petitioner are residing and whether they are in a position to furnish surety bond or not.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ravi @ Bire
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Mukta Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court