Kamender v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Delhi High Court granted parole for a convict serving a social service sentence under the IPC and the Arms Act. The petitioner, a trained painter, was released on a three-week parole subject to reporting to local police and surrendering after the period expires.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner released on parole for three weeks with a bond of Rs.10,000, condition of reporting to SHO on Mondays, and surrender after the period.
What the court decided
$~16
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 60/2018
| KAMENDER | Through | ..... Petitioner Mr. Vikas Padora with Mr. Dipanshu Chugh, Advs. |
|---|---|---|
| versus | ||
| STATE | Through | ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State. Ispector Sursh Chand, SHO PS Gokul Pur with ASI Puran Singh PS Gokul Pur. |
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R % 09.01.2018
Crl. M.A. No.385/2018 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 60/2018
Petitioner is seeking parole for the reasons mentioned in the petition. The primary reason is that the petitioner wants to reconnect with his family and his social ties. The nominal roll of the petitioner reflects that the petitioner is a convict under Section 307 of the IPC as also Section 25 of the Arms Act. The maximum sentence awarded to him is RI 5 years. As on 14.12.2017 he had undergone incarceration of almost 2 years 7 months and 23 days; he has earned remissions of 4 months and 18 days. His jail conduct is satisfactory. He is working
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted parole for three weeks on furnishing a bond and under specific conditions.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KAMENDER
- respondent
STATE
Coram
INDERMEET KAUR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court