Quashed

Ravinder Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC11 Jan 2018W.P.(CRL)/609/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi quashed FIR No.4/2016 and subsequent proceedings for driving rashly and causing hurt, alongside Motor Vehicles Act offences. The court accepted the parties' settlement via Delhi Mediation Centre, where the complainant received ₹90,000 compensation. The order mandated the petitioner deposit ₹10,000 with the Juvenile Justice Fund within four weeks before quashing was effectiv

What did the court decide?

Quashed FIR No.4/2016 and proceedings under Sections 279/338 IPC and Sections 146/196 Motor Vehicles Act subject to petitioner depositing ₹10,000 with Juvenile Justice Fund within four weeks.

Ravinder Singh Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~17

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

+ W.P.(CRL) 609/2017 & Crl.M.A. 33	34/2017
RAVINDER SINGH Represented by:	..... Petitioner Ms. Prabha Sharma, Mr. Balraj, Advs.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Represented by:	..... Respondent Mr. Piyush Singhal, proxy for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC with SI Govind Singh PS Uttam Nagar.
	R-2 in person.

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

¶5

O R D E R % 11.01.2018

¶6

By the present petition the petitioner seek quashing of FIR No. 4/2016 under Sections 279/338 IPC and Sections 146/196 of the Motor Vehicles Act registered at PS Uttam Nagar, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.

¶7

Learned proxy counsel for the learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State on instructions from Investigating Officer submits that in the above-noted FIR the petitioner is the only accused and respondent No.2 the only complainant/ victim.

¶8

W.P.(CRL) 609/2017 page 1 of 3

¶9

Respondent No. 2 is present in Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer. He states that he has settled the matter with the petitioners before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts on 27^th October, 2016. In lieu of his claim for medical expenses, compensation, mental agony and pain, the respondent No.2 has already received a sum of ₹90,000/- and he does not wish to pursue the above-noted FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

¶10

The petitioner who is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel affirms the statement of respondent No.2. He assures that he will be careful in future and to show remorse undertakes to deposit the cost.

¶11

In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

¶12

Consequently, FIR No. 4/2016 under Sections 279/338 IPC and Sections 146/196 of the Motor Vehicles Act registered at PS Uttam Nagar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of ₹10,000/- with the Juvenile Justice Fund maintained by the Registrar General of this Court within four weeks.

¶13

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

¶14

page 2 of 3

¶15

W.P.(CRL) 609/2017

¶16

Petition and application are disposed of. Order dasti.

¶17

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

¶18

JANUARY 11, 2018 ‘ga’

¶19

W.P.(CRL) 609/2017

¶20

page 3 of 3

Ravinder Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravinder Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar Vs Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Muthuvel Palani M. Vs C Angala Eswari & Ors.

Jitender Bhai Shah & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

S C Aggarwal Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Mangelal Sunil Agrawal Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ashwin Alias Kakey Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Reena Vs State Govt.of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Manoj Pal Lalwas Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shahnawaz Hussain Vs State

Mustkim Khan Vs State (Govt of NCT Delhi)

Capt Gurusharan Singh Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Kanish Raaj Gambhir Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Jagan Nath @ Raju Vs State