In this criminal writ petition, the Court found that the petitioner's wife, Smt. Asha, refused to accompany him in Court. Consequently, the Court issued no further directions for her return and disposed of the petition, leaving it open for the petitioner to take appropriate legal steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
%
O R D E R 09.01.2018
Smt. Asha, the wife of the petitioner has been produced in Court.
We have interacted with her in the Court. She states that she does not wish to go with the petitioner.
In the circumstances, no further directions can be issued in the matter for the return of Smt. Asha with the petitioner. It is left open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law as he is advised.
The petition stands disposed of.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
P.S.TEJI, J
JANUARY 09, 2018/ PB
RAJESH KUMAR
THE STATE & ORS
VIPIN SANGHI
P.S. TEJI
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
