The High Court of Delhi disposed of Crl.M.A. No. 30496/2018 and permitted the withdrawal of Crl.M.A. No. 9861/2018, dismissing it as withdrawn.
Permitted withdrawal of Crl.M.A. No. 9861/2018; dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
Represented by: Mr. Ajay M. Lal, Advocate.
versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State. Mr. Shivam Bajaj, Advocate for R-5/applicant.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 07.09.2018
Crl.M.A. No. 30496/2018
Copy of the receipt of the cost paid as imposed vide order dated 23rd August, 2018 has been handed over which is taken on record.
Application is disposed of.
Crl.M.A. No. 9861/2018
By this application, the applicant/respondent No. 5 seeks leave to withdrawn Crl.M.A. No. 9861/2018 by which he sought action under Section 340 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner.
For the reasons stated in the application withdrawal of Crl.M.A. No. 9861/2018 is permitted.
Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
SEPTEMBER 07, 2018 ‘yo’
Prakash Nagar
District Magistrate & Ors
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
